Know it stopped
before the business does.

Tracks every critical interface and fires when it passes the configured silence window — 5, 30 or 120 minutes, set per interface.

Gain · the time between the outage and the alert stops depending on someone opening a dashboard.

What makes it different · it detects absence of success, not presence of error. That is the only way to see the outage that raises no error — and most of them raise none.

Slack, Teams, email, Telegram or WhatsApp, in each person's language, with a test button that sends a real message before you depend on it.

Gain · the warning arrives where the team already is, at 3am, with nobody watching a screen.

What makes it different · alerts are split by audience: an outage wakes the on-call rota, billing and quota go by email only. Mixing them is the shortest path to a muted channel.

From an outage event, it gathers the interface history, the artefact state, the latest executions and recent changes, and writes the diagnosis as a PDF.

Gain · the diagnosis stops depending on the person with five years in the company.

What makes it different · it comes out as a document ready to circulate — including with people outside integration, who are usually the ones asking for the explanation.

The tenant's processing on one screen: completed, failed, processing and retrying, with duration and status per message.

Gain · answers “is it running?” without opening Cloud Integration.

What makes it different · it puts executions, certificates and queues in one place, which in CPI are three different screens.

Tracks tenant failures and groups the recurring ones instead of listing the same thing a hundred times.

Gain · separates the new error from the usual one — which is what decides where the next hour goes.

What makes it different · suppression is counted and shown: you know how many times it repeated, without receiving a hundred alerts.

Scores tenant health across performance, security, error handling and readability, and shows where the risk is concentrated.

Gain · gives you a number for the governance meeting, with the technical detail behind it.

What makes it different · the score comes from reading the real artefact, not from a questionnaire answered by whoever built it.

Keeps a snapshot of your artefacts and shows the difference between two versions: what changed, when and in which environment.

Gain · answers “what changed since the last time it worked?” without relying on anyone's memory.

What makes it different · it compares versions with a written explanation, not just an XML diff nobody reads.

Tracks tenant certificate expiry and warns ahead of time.

Gain · removes a whole category of incidents that have a known date.

What makes it different · the warning goes by email, not through the on-call channel: it has a deadline, it does not need to wake anyone.

Answers “why did this message fail” from the real log, and guides the incident from symptom to hypothesis.

Gain · shortens first-line handling — and what escalates arrives with context.

What makes it different · it records what has already been ruled out, so today's on-call engineer builds on yesterday's work.

Checks interfaces against quality rules continuously and warns when a change makes things worse.

Gain · quality stops being a quarterly audit and becomes something you follow.

What makes it different · the ruler is the same validator that rejects artefacts on import — what it asks here is what the tenant would ask there.

Each organisation chooses how long it keeps noise, errors and outages.

Gain · history lasts as long as your policy says, not as long as the vendor decided.

What makes it different · minimum floors protect the incident history: you cannot accidentally delete what the next audit would need.